Manufacturing website development
What is manufacturing website development?
Manufacturing website development is the engineering half of a manufacturer's website: platform selection, catalog and part number architecture, ERP and CRM integration, file handling for CAD and specification downloads, performance work against Core Web Vitals, and migration from an existing site without losing indexed URLs or gated assets.
2.0s
Largest Contentful Paint
200ms
Interaction to Next Paint
0.05CLS
Cumulative Layout Shift
400ms
Time to First Byte
Platform selection
Platform is chosen against catalog size, integration depth and who maintains the site afterwards. Every option below is a reasonable choice for some manufacturers and a poor one for others.
| Platform | Fits when | Breaks when |
|---|---|---|
| WordPress | Marketing-led site, in-house editors, modest catalog | Catalog grows past a few thousand items, or plugins accumulate into a performance and security problem |
| Webflow | Design-led site, small team, no heavy integration | Server-side integration or complex catalog logic is needed |
| Next.js | Large catalog, real integration, strict performance targets | Nobody on the team can maintain a codebase and no retainer covers it |
| Shopify | Transactional sales of stocked, configurable products | The primary conversion is an RFQ rather than a cart |
| Headless CMS with a custom front end | Content editors and engineers both need control, multi-channel output | The team is too small to justify two systems |
The question that settles it is rarely technical: who edits this site in eighteen months, and what can they be expected to know.
ERP, CRM and quoting integration
Integration is where most manufacturing website projects overrun, usually because the read is easy and the write is not. Scope the direction of data flow before the platform.
| System | Typical role | What the website does with it |
|---|---|---|
| Epicor, JobBOSS, E2, ProShop | Shop floor ERP and job costing | Reads part numbers, stock and lead time; rarely writes |
| NetSuite | ERP and financials | Reads catalog and availability, writes order or quote records |
| HubSpot, Salesforce | CRM and pipeline | Writes RFQ submissions with attribution, reads owner routing |
| Paperless Parts | Quoting for machined and fabricated parts | Hands off the part file and quote request into the quoting workflow |
| PIM | Product attribute mastering | Reads attributes and assets as the catalog source of truth |
Catalog and part number architecture
Catalog architecture decides page count, and page count decides most of the build. A manufacturer with 40 products and five attributes each is a small site. A distributor with 20,000 part numbers is a data project with a website attached.
The decisions that matter are which attributes become filters, which become facets with their own indexable URLs, and which stay on the page as text. Making every attribute a facet produces tens of thousands of thin URLs; making none of them one leaves the long tail uncaptured.
Part number search has to tolerate how buyers actually type: with and without dashes, with a competitor's number, with a partial. That is a search configuration problem rather than a design one, and it is worth more than any layout decision on a distributor site.
CAD and specification file handling
Files are served from object storage with signed URLs rather than from the application server, in both directions. Uploads go straight from the browser to storage against a presigned URL, so a large assembly does not pass through the site at all, and downloads are issued the same way.
Content type, extension and size are validated when the upload URL is issued, not when the bytes arrive, because once the browser is uploading directly the server is no longer in the path and cannot reject anything.
Gating is a commercial decision rather than a technical one. Gated files produce fewer, better identified leads and fewer downstream specifications; ungated files do the reverse. It is worth deciding deliberately rather than inheriting whatever the old site did.
Performance targets
Industrial buyers browse on plant floor connections and shop tablets, so performance is a conversion constraint rather than a technical vanity metric.
| Metric | Target | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Largest Contentful Paint | < 2.0 s | Plant floor connections are poor and buyers browse on tablets |
| Interaction to Next Paint | < 200 ms | RFQ form responsiveness directly affects completion |
| Cumulative Layout Shift | < 0.05 | Field shift is a leading cause of RFQ abandonment |
| Time to First Byte | < 400 ms | Crawl efficiency across a large catalog |
Migration and replatform
Most manufacturing sites being rebuilt have a decade of accumulated URLs, some of which carry the only links the domain has ever earned. A migration that drops them converts a rebuild into a ranking loss that takes a year to recover.
The work is unglamorous and it is the part worth insisting on: a full inventory of existing URLs, a mapping of every one to its replacement, redirects tested before launch rather than after, and gated assets moved with their access rules intact.
Related work
What drives the cost of manufacturing website development
Development cost is driven by integration and data, not by page count. A large site with no integration is often cheaper to build than a small one that has to write back to an ERP.
| Driver | Costs less when | Costs more when |
|---|---|---|
| Integration direction | Read only, or no integration at all | Writing back to an ERP or quoting system, with error handling and reconciliation |
| Catalog size and data quality | A few hundred items with consistent attributes | Tens of thousands of items with inconsistent or incomplete attributes |
| Search requirements | Category browse | Part number, partial and competitor cross-reference search |
| File library | A handful of downloads | Versioned CAD and specification libraries with gating and access control |
| Migration surface | A small site with few indexed URLs | A decade of URLs, gated assets and a live catalog to map and redirect |
| Authentication | Everything public | A customer portal with order status and per-account pricing |
Frequently asked questions
What CMS is best for a manufacturing website?
There is no single answer, and the deciding question is usually who maintains the site in eighteen months. WordPress suits in-house editors and modest catalogs. Next.js suits large catalogs, real integration and strict performance targets. Shopify suits stocked transactional products rather than RFQ-led selling.
Can our website pull live data from our ERP?
Reading stock, lead time or part attributes from an ERP is routine. Writing back is where scope grows, because it needs error handling, reconciliation and a decision about which system is authoritative when they disagree. Scope the direction before the platform.
How do we handle CAD downloads at scale?
Serve them from object storage with signed URLs rather than from the application server, and keep the file list associated with product records instead of a folder. Uploads should go direct to storage against a presigned URL, validated at the point the URL is issued.
How do we avoid losing rankings when we migrate?
Inventory every existing URL, map each one to its replacement, and test the redirects before launch rather than after. The pages carrying your only earned links are usually old and unglamorous, which is exactly why they get dropped in a rebuild.
Request a quote
Placeholder: scope and next-step copy. Section 8.1 puts RFQ submission at tier 1.